<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the informed tenant&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinformedtenant.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinformedtenant.com</link>
	<description>Waterloo Region Office Real Estate and Tenants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:51:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everyone Gives by Andrea Dubeckyj</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2012/01/23/everyone-gives/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea Dubeckyj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=548#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://colliersink.com/2012/01/24/547/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Colliers Ink&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
John Lind beat me to it, but here it is, HIS post on what &quot;Everyone Gives&quot; is all about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://colliersink.com/2012/01/24/547/" rel="nofollow">Colliers Ink</a> and commented:<br />
John Lind beat me to it, but here it is, HIS post on what &#8220;Everyone Gives&#8221; is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Semi-Annual Waterloo Region Office Market Report by John Lind</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/10/31/semi-annual-waterloo-region-office-market-report/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=497#comment-182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben,

You do not owe me an apology.  I am pleased you read our research publication and consider it “good research”.  I think I found it humorous because you offered to send out the publication rather than just link people to the same public site which you downloaded the publication from yourself.  In hindsight, I am sure this was nothing more than you providing good service to your clients and readership.

We had an unprecedented amount of feedback with regard to this report and a number of our colleagues were less diplomatic than you regarding our findings.  We also had a number of media inquiries &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benjaminbach.com/media/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;which you were part of &lt;/a&gt;and it sparked a big exchange of information between Colliers and our clients. This sort of exchange is important and I will happily discuss our findings with anybody interest in listening.  For me and Colliers as a whole, it is all about providing the highest quality research and uncommon knowledge, not anecdotal evidence.

Thanks again for your comments and your ongoing support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>You do not owe me an apology.  I am pleased you read our research publication and consider it “good research”.  I think I found it humorous because you offered to send out the publication rather than just link people to the same public site which you downloaded the publication from yourself.  In hindsight, I am sure this was nothing more than you providing good service to your clients and readership.</p>
<p>We had an unprecedented amount of feedback with regard to this report and a number of our colleagues were less diplomatic than you regarding our findings.  We also had a number of media inquiries <a href="http://www.benjaminbach.com/media/" rel="nofollow">which you were part of </a>and it sparked a big exchange of information between Colliers and our clients. This sort of exchange is important and I will happily discuss our findings with anybody interest in listening.  For me and Colliers as a whole, it is all about providing the highest quality research and uncommon knowledge, not anecdotal evidence.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your comments and your ongoing support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Semi-Annual Waterloo Region Office Market Report by Benjamin Bach</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/10/31/semi-annual-waterloo-region-office-market-report/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Bach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=497#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I wasn&#039;t trying to be humorous, I just like to offer good research to people, regardless of the source - and always with full attribution.  If you&#039;d like, I will remove the offer to email the report.  Let me know John, thanks.

-Ben]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I wasn&#8217;t trying to be humorous, I just like to offer good research to people, regardless of the source &#8211; and always with full attribution.  If you&#8217;d like, I will remove the offer to email the report.  Let me know John, thanks.</p>
<p>-Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterloo Vacancy is projected to Spike by John Lind</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/09/08/waterloo-vacancy-is-projected-to-spike/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=474#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a couple of sources.

1. New buildings that were leased earlier this year are still not occupied.
2. Agfa and Open Text&#039;s new buildings are adding vacant space to the market.
3. The space Agfa and Open Text are leaving will be vacant.
4. 609 Kumpf will be coming on line although this space counts as both vacant and available.

Good question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a couple of sources.</p>
<p>1. New buildings that were leased earlier this year are still not occupied.<br />
2. Agfa and Open Text&#8217;s new buildings are adding vacant space to the market.<br />
3. The space Agfa and Open Text are leaving will be vacant.<br />
4. 609 Kumpf will be coming on line although this space counts as both vacant and available.</p>
<p>Good question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterloo Vacancy is projected to Spike by Andrea</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/09/08/waterloo-vacancy-is-projected-to-spike/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=474#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s all the vacant space coming from in q3/q4??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s all the vacant space coming from in q3/q4??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are Taxes Lower in Former Industrial Buildings? by John Lind</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/08/16/why-are-taxes-lower-in-former-industrial-buildings/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=451#comment-163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is why I always call Chaney with tax questions. Rarely are they obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I always call Chaney with tax questions. Rarely are they obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are Taxes Lower in Former Industrial Buildings? by J. Chaney Morkill</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/08/16/why-are-taxes-lower-in-former-industrial-buildings/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Chaney Morkill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=451#comment-162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Renovated / Converted Brick and Beam buildings are already approaching unsustainable tax levels, particularly those now being assessed based on their income streams.  

Municipalities have the option to adopt separate tax rates for properties qualifying for New Construction.  This optional tax class offers a lower tax rate compared to its Commercial or Industrial counterparts as its composite rate includes the education tax rate reductions set out by the Province.  What seems unfair is fully renovated properties, such as brick and beam, are not eligible for this tax class.

The significant increases we&#039;re seeing in Brick and Bream buildings are interpreted as mere market value increases by assessment and tax authorities.  What&#039;s not taken into account is the full transformation of the properties, often times from derelict end of life industrial product to chic open concept office and retail space - Virtual New Construction.  The reason for this is the lack of a legislative mechanism by which the affected property can qualify as &quot;New Construction&quot;.

While the above may serve as an tax impediment to some properties, others may benefit by NOT qualifying New Construction as properties with incrased assessed values following renovation can continue to benefit from its original &quot;Tax Capping&quot; position. 

Suffice it to say, affected property owners are well advised to consult a tax professional to evaluate the tax position and circumstances of each property and project in order to ensure taxes are minimized.

Have a great long weekend!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renovated / Converted Brick and Beam buildings are already approaching unsustainable tax levels, particularly those now being assessed based on their income streams.  </p>
<p>Municipalities have the option to adopt separate tax rates for properties qualifying for New Construction.  This optional tax class offers a lower tax rate compared to its Commercial or Industrial counterparts as its composite rate includes the education tax rate reductions set out by the Province.  What seems unfair is fully renovated properties, such as brick and beam, are not eligible for this tax class.</p>
<p>The significant increases we&#8217;re seeing in Brick and Bream buildings are interpreted as mere market value increases by assessment and tax authorities.  What&#8217;s not taken into account is the full transformation of the properties, often times from derelict end of life industrial product to chic open concept office and retail space &#8211; Virtual New Construction.  The reason for this is the lack of a legislative mechanism by which the affected property can qualify as &#8220;New Construction&#8221;.</p>
<p>While the above may serve as an tax impediment to some properties, others may benefit by NOT qualifying New Construction as properties with incrased assessed values following renovation can continue to benefit from its original &#8220;Tax Capping&#8221; position. </p>
<p>Suffice it to say, affected property owners are well advised to consult a tax professional to evaluate the tax position and circumstances of each property and project in order to ensure taxes are minimized.</p>
<p>Have a great long weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are Taxes Lower in Former Industrial Buildings? by John Lind</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/08/16/why-are-taxes-lower-in-former-industrial-buildings/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=451#comment-161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand how the municipality can manipulate or would want to keep taxes low in redeveloped buildings. What is the reasoning?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how the municipality can manipulate or would want to keep taxes low in redeveloped buildings. What is the reasoning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are Taxes Lower in Former Industrial Buildings? by Chris Fyvie (@ChrisFyvie)</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/08/16/why-are-taxes-lower-in-former-industrial-buildings/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Fyvie (@ChrisFyvie)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=451#comment-159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also blame it on the the government / politicians simply not getting their act together.  If they taxed the renovated / converted brick and beam office buildings in Toronto properly they could pay for the TTC renovations.

http://officesearchtoronto.com
http://twitter.com/chrisfyvie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also blame it on the the government / politicians simply not getting their act together.  If they taxed the renovated / converted brick and beam office buildings in Toronto properly they could pay for the TTC renovations.</p>
<p><a href="http://officesearchtoronto.com" rel="nofollow">http://officesearchtoronto.com</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/chrisfyvie" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/chrisfyvie</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Letter to BlackBerry Bosses Still Rings in My Head by John Lind</title>
		<link>http://theinformedtenant.com/2011/08/12/open-letter-to-blackberry-bosses-still-rings-in-my-head/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinformedtenant.com/?p=432#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a great example of what I&#039;m talking about.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2011/07/15/at-americas-best-workplaces-good-design-reigns-supreme/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a great example of what I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2011/07/15/at-americas-best-workplaces-good-design-reigns-supreme/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2011/07/15/at-americas-best-workplaces-good-design-reigns-supreme/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

